AdGuard VPN vs NordVPN: Which One Actually Handles Streaming Better?

NordVPN builds its entire pitch around being “the fastest VPN service,” with a server count it's happy to publish. Here's how that stacks up against AdGuard VPN's quieter, privacy-first approach.

AdGuard VPNNordVPN
2-Yr Price€2.69/mo€3.49/mo
Devices1010
Servers / Locations75+ locations, server count undisclosed225+ locations, exact server count published
Streaming claimGeneric FAQ line only“Fastest VPN” branding, no named platforms
Torrent policyNot stated anywhereWidely used, not explicit on pricing page
Money-back30 days30 days

Measured head-to-head: AdGuard VPN vs NordVPN

Our own captures for AdGuard VPN and NordVPN, side by side, with every gap and every limit.

MeasuredAdGuard VPNNordVPN
Baseline download (VPN off)295 Mbps294 Mbps
Nearest Europe: serverMarseilleBerlin
Nearest Europe: download136 Mbps (46%)210 Mbps (72%)
Nearest Europe: upload180 Mbps181 Mbps
Nearest Europe: ping46 ms31 ms
Long-distance US: download200 Mbps (68%)200 Mbps (68%)
Long-distance US: ping171 ms111 ms
DNS leak test captured captured
WebRTC leak test captured captured
BBC iPlayer captured captured
Netflixnot captured captured

Takeaway: on the Europe route AdGuard VPN kept 46% of its baseline against 72% for NordVPN (a gap of 25 points); on the US route 68% against 68%. The gap is large enough to be worth noting, though it is still one run per route.

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each VPN. Server country and protocol can differ; one run per route.

All AdGuard VPN captures →

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which is faster, AdGuard VPN or NordVPN?

On the nearest-European route AdGuard VPN delivered 136 Mbps against NordVPN's 210 Mbps (46% vs 72% of each baseline); on the US route 200 vs 200 Mbps. One run each, so treat small gaps as noise.

Is AdGuard VPN or NordVPN better for streaming?

We captured AdGuard VPN playing BBC iPlayer. For NordVPN we captured BBC iPlayer, Netflix. Missing results mean not captured, not failed.

Were both tested under the same conditions?

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each, but the server country and protocol can differ; the table lists them.

Where can I see the raw captures?

The screenshots and recordings for AdGuard VPN are on its tests pages. We publish captures only for the VPN each site is about.

NordVPN advertises thousands of servers across 225+ locations and brands its NordLynx-based network as “the fastest VPN service,” with a dedicated page explaining what makes it fast. AdGuard VPN, by contrast, lists 75+ locations without a server count and doesn't make a speed-superiority claim at all – its FAQ simply tells you to check server ping manually.

Neither brand names specific streaming platforms in its marketing, but NordVPN's scale and its “fastest VPN” positioning are the kind of specific, falsifiable claims a streaming-focused buyer can actually test and hold the company to. AdGuard's positioning – “Safe. Unnoticed. Free.” – is built around stealth in restrictive networks, not speed leadership.

On price, AdGuard VPN's 2-year plan (€2.69/month) actually undercuts NordVPN's cheapest 2-year Basic plan (€3.49/month), and both carry a 30-day money-back guarantee. NordVPN's plan bundles in more security extras (malware protection on higher tiers); AdGuard keeps it simpler and bundles a free AdGuard DNS subscription instead.

For torrenting specifically, neither AdGuard nor NordVPN's basic tier makes an explicit P2P promise on their pricing pages, though NordVPN is widely used for it in practice thanks to its scale of servers. AdGuard's total silence on the topic makes it the harder of the two to recommend confidently for P2P.

Verdict

If unblocking streaming and raw speed are your priority, NordVPN's published server count and speed-first branding give you something concrete to evaluate. AdGuard VPN is the cheaper, more privacy-first pick – fine for streaming as a side benefit, not the reason to buy it.

See Today's Best VPN Deals