AdGuard VPN vs Surfshark: Unlimited Devices Changes the Torrenting Math

Surfshark's headline feature – unlimited simultaneous devices – and its audited no-logs policy make it a popular pick for households. How does AdGuard VPN's 10-device cap compare?

AdGuard VPNSurfshark
2-Yr Price€2.69/mo€2.49/mo
Devices10Unlimited
Servers / Locations75+ locations, server count undisclosed4,500+ servers / 100 countries
Streaming claimGeneric FAQ line onlyNo named platforms
Torrent policyNot stated anywhereNo explicit policy, large network
Money-back30 days30 days

Measured head-to-head: AdGuard VPN vs Surfshark

Our own captures for AdGuard VPN and Surfshark, side by side, with every gap and every limit.

MeasuredAdGuard VPNSurfshark
Baseline download (VPN off)295 Mbps296 Mbps
Nearest Europe: serverMarseilleManchester
Nearest Europe: download136 Mbps (46%)210 Mbps (71%)
Nearest Europe: upload180 Mbps181 Mbps
Nearest Europe: ping46 ms79 ms
Long-distance US: download200 Mbps (68%)203 Mbps (69%)
Long-distance US: ping171 ms112 ms
DNS leak test captured captured
WebRTC leak test captured captured
BBC iPlayer captured captured
Netflixnot capturednot captured

Takeaway: on the Europe route AdGuard VPN kept 46% of its baseline against 71% for Surfshark (a gap of 25 points); on the US route 68% against 69%. The gap is large enough to be worth noting, though it is still one run per route.

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each VPN. Server country and protocol can differ; one run per route.

All AdGuard VPN captures →

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which is faster, AdGuard VPN or Surfshark?

On the nearest-European route AdGuard VPN delivered 136 Mbps against Surfshark's 210 Mbps (46% vs 71% of each baseline); on the US route 200 vs 203 Mbps. One run each, so treat small gaps as noise.

Is AdGuard VPN or Surfshark better for streaming?

We captured AdGuard VPN playing BBC iPlayer. For Surfshark we captured BBC iPlayer. Missing results mean not captured, not failed.

Were both tested under the same conditions?

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each, but the server country and protocol can differ; the table lists them.

Where can I see the raw captures?

The screenshots and recordings for AdGuard VPN are on its tests pages. We publish captures only for the VPN each site is about.

Surfshark allows unlimited devices on every plan, a meaningful advantage over AdGuard VPN's 10-device ceiling if you're covering a large household or want to run always-on connections on a home server or router for torrenting alongside personal devices.

On network size, Surfshark publishes 4,500+ servers across 100 countries – both numbers AdGuard doesn't disclose (AdGuard states only “75+ locations”). Surfshark also advertises 10 Gbps-upgraded servers, a concrete performance figure with no direct AdGuard equivalent.

Pricing is close: Surfshark's Starter plan runs about €2.49/month on a 24-month term, similar to AdGuard's €2.69/month 2-year plan. Surfshark's no-logs policy is independently audited, which is one verification step further than AdGuard's own unaudited no-logging statement.

Neither Surfshark nor AdGuard names specific streaming platforms in their core marketing, and neither publishes an explicit torrenting policy on the pages we reviewed – though Surfshark's larger, disclosed server network is generally treated as more torrent-friendly in practice across the wider VPN market.

Verdict

For multi-device households or anyone who wants an audited no-logs claim and a disclosed server count, Surfshark is the stronger pick at a similar price. AdGuard VPN remains competitive only if device count and network size matter less to you than sticking with a long-established privacy brand.

See Today's Best VPN Deals