AdGuard VPN vs hide.me: The One Rival That Actually Names Streaming Support

hide.me is the one VPN in this comparison that explicitly lists “Streaming Support” and “Dynamic Port Forwarding” as named features – exactly the specificity AdGuard VPN's marketing avoids.

AdGuard VPNhide.me
2-Yr Price€2.69/mo€2.69/mo
Devices1010
Servers / Locations75+ locations, server count undisclosed92 locations / 2,600 servers
Streaming claimGeneric FAQ line onlyNamed “Streaming Support” feature
Torrent policyNot stated anywhereNamed “Dynamic Port Forwarding” feature
Money-back30 days30 days

Measured head-to-head: AdGuard VPN vs hide.me

Our own captures for AdGuard VPN and hide.me, side by side, with every gap and every limit.

MeasuredAdGuard VPNhide.me
Baseline download (VPN off)295 Mbps298 Mbps
Nearest Europe: serverMarseilleBerlin
Nearest Europe: download136 Mbps (46%)222 Mbps (74%)
Nearest Europe: upload180 Mbps178 Mbps
Nearest Europe: ping46 ms47 ms
Long-distance US: download200 Mbps (68%)200 Mbps (67%)
Long-distance US: ping171 ms163 ms
DNS leak test captured captured
WebRTC leak test captured captured
BBC iPlayer capturednot captured
Netflixnot captured captured

Takeaway: on the Europe route AdGuard VPN kept 46% of its baseline against 74% for hide.me (a gap of 28 points); on the US route 68% against 67%. The gap is large enough to be worth noting, though it is still one run per route.

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each VPN. Server country and protocol can differ; one run per route.

All AdGuard VPN captures →

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which is faster, AdGuard VPN or hide.me?

On the nearest-European route AdGuard VPN delivered 136 Mbps against hide.me's 222 Mbps (46% vs 74% of each baseline); on the US route 200 vs 200 Mbps. One run each, so treat small gaps as noise.

Is AdGuard VPN or hide.me better for streaming?

We captured AdGuard VPN playing BBC iPlayer. For hide.me we captured Netflix. Missing results mean not captured, not failed.

Were both tested under the same conditions?

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each, but the server country and protocol can differ; the table lists them.

Where can I see the raw captures?

The screenshots and recordings for AdGuard VPN are on its tests pages. We publish captures only for the VPN each site is about.

hide.me's pricing page lists its Premium plan features as a checklist: unlimited data, “92 Locations / 2,600 Servers,” 10 simultaneous connections, no logs, a fixed IP option, “Streaming Support,” and “Dynamic Port Forwarding.” That last two are direct, named answers to exactly the questions AdGuard VPN leaves open.

Price is almost identical: hide.me's Premium plan runs €2.69/month on a 24-month term – the same headline price as AdGuard VPN's 2-year plan. At that price, hide.me discloses a specific server count and specific streaming/torrenting-relevant features; AdGuard discloses neither.

hide.me also offers a genuinely usable free tier (8 locations, 1 connection, unlimited data at restricted speed) alongside a no-credit-card trial path, which is a different shape from AdGuard's free plan (3 GB/month cap, 2 devices) but comparable as a way to test before paying.

AdGuard's advantages here are brand history – 17 years as a privacy-tools maker – and the Exclusions split-tunneling feature, which hide.me's public pricing page doesn't call out by name.

Verdict

At essentially the same price, hide.me states plainly what AdGuard VPN leaves unstated: a real server count and named streaming/torrenting-relevant features. For an unlock-focused buyer specifically, that specificity makes hide.me the easier recommendation.

See Today's Best VPN Deals